Today, as education informatization enters the campus, teachers have become a key hub for connecting policies with parents and students. However, there are still some teachers who do not like to use educational information tools. There is no unreasonable dislike, no unconditional absolute support. What is the reason behind teachers' dislike of using educational information tools? Today, the teaching judge invited a fat teacher from Shanghai to share his views on this issue. Let us take a look at what is the reason why some teachers do not like educational information tools from the perspective of a teacher who has actively embraced educational informationization. Education informatization, teachers are marginalized education information, in simple terms, the use of computer multimedia and network information technology in the field of education, to promote the comprehensive reform of education, to adapt to the new requirements of the information society for the development of education. Education informatization is an important part of national informatization. It is of inevitable choice to transform educational thoughts and concepts, deepen education reform, improve education quality and efficiency, and cultivate innovative talents. It is an inevitable choice for realizing the leap-forward development of education. Educational informatization has both the attributes of “technology†and the attributes of “educationâ€. The core content of educational informationization is teaching informationization. Teaching is the central work in the field of education. Teaching informationization is to modernize teaching methods, informationization of education and communication, and modernization of teaching methods. This is the basic understanding of education informatization. The key points are three points: 1. Education informatization takes place in the field of education; 2. Education informatization contains the dual attributes of “technology†and “educationâ€; The core of educational informationization is teaching informationization. However, after reviewing the road of education informatization for 30 years, the influence of the main teachers of teaching is very embarrassing in the construction of educational informationization in the country: 1. The application mode of teaching informatization is created by educational experts. But it does not necessarily happen in the real scene of teaching; 2. The evaluation method of teaching informatization is expert-led (even enterprise-led), but it is not necessarily able to select “dry goods†that can be copied and promoted; 3. Teaching informationization The promotion of results is top-down, but it is not necessarily acceptable for teachers and students to vote with their feet. It can be said that education informatization, teachers are being marginalized, or lose the right to speak. "Sent": Do not love, can not be used, do not dare to start a new school every September, teachers and students will find that the school has added a lot of "new stuff" - 3D printer, VR, iclass... These new equipment comes from educational information products that the education authorities have added to the school. It should be said that such "new toys" are really eye-catching, but who will use them? Who manages them? Where is the curriculum resources? Some people will say that this is a supporting research equipment for the school to declare the subject, there will always be people, there will always be people to manage, there will always be curriculum resources. However, until the end of the project, in addition to several expert research meetings, several public class presentations, several project group activities, it seems that everything has not happened, these new toys gradually become the display in the classroom, waiting for the "new toys" arrival. Such a scene is not written by the author, but is actually happening in the current basic education. The reason why these educational authorities "sent" or "declared procurement" technical equipment was "sheltered", some people accused the teacher of being old and reluctant to use new equipment, but I have to say - this pot, the teacher can't keep it! Three reasons: 1. Purchasing only has the right to use, there is no right to choose, how can products that are lacking in understanding can be used by teachers! 2. Training is easy, the manual is as thin as a flap or as thick as a brick, how can a product without guidance be allowed? The teacher can use! 3. Product failure, authorization expires, no one after sale, just buy and ignore, how can products that lack stable protection can make teachers dare to use! Of course, it can not be denied that teachers are indeed lazy in the process of teaching informationization. Subjective reasons such as responsibility, but as the basis of teaching information, the "sent" information products in the process of reincarnation in a year, so that such subjective reasons have more market. "Self-use": easy to use but not dare to use, but can not be used with ease, is the teacher completely passive in the process of teaching informationization? Naturally, it is not, I also participated in the observation and evaluation activities of various education and teaching in the country, among which Many teachers have explored and explored good products and good programs developed by themselves in the teaching process, but these "self-use" are faced with the use of but not dare to use, but can not be used. For example, in the chemistry class of the educational informationization open class held in a certain place in the north in July, the teacher applied the “beaker†App (a mobile application software that can simulate chemical experiments) to organize students. The inquiry-based learning of the redox reaction, after the teacher explained the relevant knowledge, organized the students to conduct inquiry learning according to the learning path map on the task list, and the students used the tablet interaction through the group learning in the class (the beaker app supports the air drop for different iPad rooms). Interaction), showing great curiosity about the knowledge I have learned. Many of my students’ views in the exchange speech are very exciting. Some of the speeches involve a higher level of theoretical inquiry. It can be said that no matter from the teaching process or learning. The effect is to evaluate, this is a boutique class that is uncompromising. However, in the final evaluation section, this lesson is named after Sun Mountain. Why? The author found the teacher, although the other party lost, but did not know why. However, the instructors who followed did not inadvertently say some reasons: the organizers of the competition also have similar analog laboratory products. Why not use it? The iPad is really good, but the local education committee has set up a special tablet for the school. Idle? Indeed, when teachers use their own information technology in the classroom, in addition to their own success or failure in teaching and exploration, they must face challenges and restrictions from the outside world. Moreover, more and more educational informationization activities are named by major enterprises. After that, such restrictions and doubts have also become factors influencing the evaluation of teaching. How far can such a self-exploration teaching informationization path go? Perfectly suited for smaller spaces like studio apartments and office, our Home Office Desk can quite easily be tucked into a corner. Though small in size, this piece offers some storage space with drawers. Our table is designed to give you plenty of leg room but also doesn't take up too much space in your home. Working Desk,Working Table,Standing Work Station,Adjustable Work Table Baklam , https://www.jmbaklam.com
The teacher does not like to use information tools? The truth is not simple.